Crypto venture capital firm Paradigm challenges SEC’s proposed definition of “exchange”

Crypto venture capital firm Paradigm challenges SEC's proposed definition of "exchange"

Most read

Loading Most Ready posts..


  • Paradigm challenges the SEC’s attempt to redefine the term “exchange” and bring DEXs under its regulatory scope.
  • According to Paradigm, the fundamental differences between DEXs and exchanges make treating them alike invalid and incoherent.
  • The firm criticizes the SEC’s rulemaking process, highlighting procedural flaws and violations of the Administrative Procedure Act.

Paradigm, a crypto venture capital firm, has criticized the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) attempt to redefine the term “exchange” and bring decentralized exchanges (DEXs) under its regulatory scope. In a detailed 14-page letter sent to the SEC, Paradigm argued that treating DEXs as traditional exchanges is invalid and incoherent.

Differences between DEXs and exchanges

Paradigm emphasized the fundamental distinctions between DEXs and exchanges that make the proposed redefinition inappropriate. DEXs operate differently from traditional exchanges, as they do not act as transaction intermediaries and lack a centralized entity overseeing the exchange. Instead, DEXs utilize automated market maker mechanisms and self-executing code to facilitate the trading of crypto assets.

The letter from Paradigm also raised concerns regarding the SEC’s rulemaking process. It highlighted procedural flaws, including the short comment period and lack of cost-benefit analysis in the initial notice published in March 2022. Although the SEC reopened the comment period in May 2022 and April 2023, Paradigm argued that these attempts did not rectify the original procedural deficiencies. The firm maintained that the SEC’s proposal violated the fair opportunity for public comment required by the Administrative Procedure Act.

Crypto industry impact and regulatory actions

The SEC’s proposed redefinition comes amidst the agency’s recent lawsuits against major crypto exchanges, Binance and Coinbase, for alleged securities violations. Paradigm suggested that the SEC’s regulatory actions against Coinbase and the intensified scrutiny on Binance could ultimately benefit Coinbase by reducing competition in the long run. However, the firm criticized the SEC’s enforcement approach, believing it has negatively affected cryptocurrency innovators in the United States.

While the SEC has designated numerous digital assets as securities over the years, Congress has yet to pass official legislation classifying crypto markets as such. The recent surge in enforcement actions targeting crypto companies following the collapse of FTX reflects the increased scrutiny by the federal regulator.

Disclaimer. The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

Share link:

Damilola Lawrence

Damilola is a crypto enthusiast, content writer, and journalist. When he is not writing, he spends most of his time reading and keeping tabs on exciting projects in the blockchain space. He also studies the ramifications of Web3 and blockchain development to have a stake in the future economy.

Stay on top of crypto news, get daily updates in your inbox

Related News

Subscribe to CryptoPolitan