$ 28,946.00 0.77%
$ 1,775.96 2.28%
$ 42.82 3.70%
$ 0.080859 1.83%
$ 6.04 1.77%
$ 0.882971 14.70%
Terra Luna Classic
$ 0.000086 31.53%

Bitcoin is not security, says SEC

Bitcoin is not security says SEC

The Securities and Exchange Commission has clarified that Bitcoin is not security in reply to a firm’s registration application. The Division of Investment Management staff has issued a reply recently mentioning that Bitcoin cannot come under the ‘security’ umbrella.

Recently, Cipher Technologies Bitcoin Fund approached the Securities and Exchange Commission to be listed as a ‘closed-end interval fund.’ To achieve this status as per the Investment Company Act 1940, it submitted that Bitcoin is classified as a security. It reiterated this stance during its written and verbal communication with the commission.

However, people at SEC differed with this stand as per the Howey framework under which they classify digital assets.

Bitcoin is not security clarifies many doubts

SEC issued a reply to Cipher’s filing where it mentioned that present owners of Bitcoin do not depend on the industrial and administrative activities of individuals to create a profit. Subsequently, Cipher plans to make heavy investments in Bitcoin under its current plans. Thus, the N-2 form submitted by the company cannot be accepted.

Further, if Bitcoin is considered a security, myriad other concerns can emerge. Bitcoin will become a huge ‘publicly offered security,’ albeit an unregistered one. Such a stance would then classify the underlying fund as an underwriter. Moreover, Cipher was not able to address various other concerns regarding safety of investors, especially with regards to custody, valuation, and prospective Bitcoin price fluctuations in the unregulated markets.

Due to the above-mentioned reasons, the SEC recorded that Cipher could not be registered as an investment company and Bitcoin is not security. It means that SEC is avoiding opening up a Pandora ’s Box by not going on that route. There will be no further review by SEC on its order. If Cipher wants to bring in significant changes to its proposal, then SEC is open to review.

Though this statement is not considered a binding precedent, it must be taken as a concrete argument that Bitcoin is not considered security as per SEC guidelines. Such a public confirmation is enough to guide other firms who wish to make similar proposals. This is in line with its recent rather strict stance on the crypto realm. SEC is relying upon its framework document launched earlier in 2019, where it laid out details of its digital assets classification.

Gurpreet Thind

Gurpreet Thind

Gurpreet Thind is pursuing Masters in Electrical Engineering at University of Ottawa. His scholarly interests include IT, computer languages and cryptocurrencies. With a special interest in blockchain powered architectures, he seeks to explore the societal impact of digital currencies as finance of the future. He is passionate about learning new languages, cultures and social media.

Related News

Hot Stories

LUNA 2.0 airdrop: What centralized exchanges are currently supporting?
Terra (LUNA) Price Prediction 2022-2030: What Next for Luna?
Bitcoin, Ethereum, Internet Computer Coin, and Filecoin Daily Price Analyses – 27 May Roundup
Cardano price analysis: ADA price continues sinking at $0.459 after substantial damage
Bitcoin price analysis: BTC rejects downside again, another push from $29,000 next?

Follow Us

Industry News

Sex workers in the US use Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies to evade federal laws
Russia research crypto for international transactions
USP plans research into the Metaverse
Community Lead Greg Miles Shares His Impressions of Working Inside the Award-winning Launchpad, UpLift DAO
Ether leads altcoin rout with $520m in liquidations as Bitcoin establishes dominance