Top Web3 Tokens and Analytics Related to Ranking Them

web3 tokens

Most read

Loading Most Ready posts..

The advent of Web3 has ushered in a new era of internet technologies, promising decentralization, transparency, and transformative possibilities. At the heart of this revolutionary ecosystem are Web3 tokens, digital assets built on blockchain networks that fuel decentralized applications and shape the future of the internet. As the Web3 space expands, evaluating and ranking these tokens becomes increasingly crucial for investors, enthusiasts, and participants.

Top Web3 tokens

Polkadot (DOT)

Polkadot (DOT) is a multi-chain protocol that creates a decentralized and scalable network of interoperable blockchains. Developed by the Web3 Foundation, it provides a framework for building and connecting independent blockchains, known as parachains, to form a unified network. Polkadot introduces a unique governance model and consensus algorithm that enables shared security among parachains. It aims to overcome the limitations of existing blockchain networks by allowing them to communicate and share data securely and efficiently.

Chainlink (LINK)

Chainlink (LINK) is a decentralized blockchain oracle network built on Ethereum. It serves as a bridge between blockchains and off-chain environments, enabling the transfer of tamper-proof data from external sources to on-chain smart contracts. Chainlink’s main purpose is to connect smart contracts with real-world data, events, payments, and other inputs securely and decentralized.

As a decentralized oracle network, Chainlink employs a network of nodes that fetch, validate, and deliver data from various sources onto blockchains for the execution of smart contracts [12]. These nodes are operated by network participants who stake Chainlink’s native cryptocurrency, LINK, as collateral. Using LINK tokens, Chainlink incentivizes node operators to provide accurate and reliable data to the network.

Filecoin (FIL)

Filecoin (FIL) is a decentralized digital payment system and cryptocurrency designed to provide secure storage and data retrieval on a cooperative blockchain network. Developed by Protocol Labs, it offers an open-source solution for utilizing unused hard drive space through renting. The network uses FIL as its native currency and records transactions and commitments on the blockchain. To ensure data integrity, Filecoin incorporates proof-of-replication and proof-of-spacetime mechanisms.

The network operates through storage and retrieval processes. Users pay storage providers in FIL to store their data on the Filecoin network. In return, storage providers receive FIL rewards for their services. Users who want to retrieve their data make retrieval payments to the respective storage providers.

Basic Attention Token (BAT)

Basic Attention Token (BAT) is a cryptocurrency and utility token that aims to revolutionize the digital advertising industry. Developed by the team behind the Brave browser, BAT introduces a new approach to advertising by creating a decentralized ecosystem that rewards users, publishers, and advertisers fairly and transparently. The token operates within the Brave browser ecosystem, which prioritizes user privacy and aims to disrupt the traditional online advertising model.

At the core of BAT is the idea of attention economics, where users’ attention is considered a valuable resource. By leveraging blockchain technology, BAT enables users to opt-in to view privacy-respecting ads and receive BAT tokens as a reward for their attention. Users can then support their favorite content creators and publishers by allocating a portion of their earned BAT tokens to them. This system incentivizes users to engage with ads while empowering content creators relying on advertising revenue.

The Graph (GRT)

The Graph (GRT) is a decentralized protocol and cryptocurrency that revolutionizes how data is indexed and queried on the blockchain. It provides a decentralized infrastructure for developers to efficiently access and organize data from various blockchains and networks, enabling them to build decentralized applications (dApps) easily. The Graph utilizes a network of nodes called Indexers, Curators, and Delegators to collectively index and query data, ensuring its accessibility and reliability.

The decentralized network also ensures integrity and censorship resistance of the indexed data, fostering trust and reliability within the ecosystem. As The Graph continues to gain adoption and expand its capabilities, it has the potential to become a fundamental building block for the decentralized web.

Ethereum Name Service (ENS)

The Ethereum Name Service (ENS) is a decentralized domain name system built on the Ethereum blockchain. It is a user-friendly and censorship-resistant way to interact with the Ethereum network by replacing long, complex addresses with human-readable domain names. ENS enables users to register and manage domain names ending in .eth, which can be associated with various Ethereum resources such as wallets, smart contracts, and decentralized websites.

With ENS, users can easily send transactions and interact with dApps using simple and memorable domain names instead of relying on lengthy hexadecimal addresses. It provides a more intuitive and familiar experience for both newcomers and experienced users of the Ethereum ecosystem. ENS domain names are stored on the Ethereum blockchain, ensuring their immutability and security.

Ranking Metrics

Market Capitalization

Market capitalization measures a token’s overall value and market significance. By multiplying the token’s current price by its total supply, the market cap showcases its relative size and helps investors and enthusiasts gauge its prominence.

Tokens with higher market capitalizations often garner attention, reflecting their perceived value and investor confidence. A large market cap can indicate widespread adoption, extensive trading activity, and solid support from the community. It also suggests the potential for liquidity, making it easier for token holders to buy, sell, and trade their assets.

When analyzing market capitalization as a ranking metric, it is crucial to consider the limitations and context surrounding this approach. While market cap provides a valuable snapshot of a token’s value, it should not be the sole factor influencing investment decisions or token rankings.

One limitation is that market capitalization can be influenced by factors such as token distribution and circulating supply. Tokens with a significant portion held by a small number of individuals or organizations may exhibit higher market caps but may not necessarily reflect broad-based adoption or widespread usage. Factors like token inflation, token burns, or supply adjustments can affect market cap calculations and subsequent rankings.

Another consideration is the volatility inherent in the cryptocurrency market. Market caps can fluctuate significantly over short periods due to price volatility, market sentiment, or external factors. Therefore, it is essential to comprehensively assess market capitalization alongside other factors and indicators to understand a token’s ranking and potential.

Trading Volume and Liquidity

Trading volume represents the total number of tokens traded within a specified period, reflecting the activity level and investor interest in a particular token. Liquidity refers to the ease with which tokens can be bought or sold without significantly impacting their price.

Analyzing trading volume and liquidity provides valuable insights into the market dynamics and overall health of a Web3 token. High trading volume indicates a vibrant market, with active participation from traders and investors. It suggests sufficient demand and supply for the token, allowing for efficient price discovery and facilitating smooth trading operations.

Tokens with high trading volume and liquidity often enjoy several advantages. They provide more opportunities for investors to enter or exit positions, enhancing market efficiency and reducing slippage. Additionally, high liquidity can attract more institutional investors and market makers, further deepening the liquidity pool and fostering a robust trading ecosystem. Sometimes, short-term speculative trading or trading bots can drive high trading volume, which may not necessarily indicate genuine market demand or long-term adoption.

Tokens with low trading volume and liquidity may experience higher price volatility and limited trading opportunities, making it challenging for investors to execute trades at desired prices.

It is advisable to consider additional factors such as order book depth, bid-ask spreads, and reputable exchanges. Tokens listed on reputable exchanges with high liquidity and trading activity often enjoy greater visibility and accessibility to a broader range of investors.

Community Engagement and Adoption Metrics

Analyzing community metrics provides insights into the level of interest, support, and participation surrounding a token within the Web3 ecosystem. 

Active Wallet Addresses: The number of active wallet addresses interacting with a token’s blockchain is an essential metric for evaluating community engagement. A higher number of active addresses indicates a more extensive user base and suggests strong interest in the token. It demonstrates that individuals actively transact, hold, or participate in the token’s ecosystem.

Social Media Activity: Monitoring social media platforms such as Twitter, Reddit, Telegram, and dedicated Web3 forums allows us to gauge community engagement and sentiment. Metrics such as the number of followers, engagement rates, and community discussions can indicate the token’s popularity, community-driven initiatives, and overall awareness.

Developer Activity: The involvement of developers in building applications, platforms, or integrations around a token showcases the token’s technical viability and potential for growth. Tracking developer activity -number of projects, code commits, and developer contributions- helps gauge the level of ecosystem development and the token’s long-term prospects.

Community-Driven Initiatives: Community-driven initiatives, such as hackathons, bounties, or governance proposals, reflect a strong and active community that actively contributes to the token’s ecosystem. The presence of vibrant community initiatives indicates a token’s ability to attract and engage a dedicated group of participants who actively collaborate and drive the token’s adoption and growth.

Token Governance: Assessing token governance mechanisms and participation can provide insights into community involvement in decision-making processes. 

Partnerships and Integrations: Collaborations and partnerships with other projects, platforms, or institutions indicate the token’s potential for broader adoption. High-profile partnerships and integrations often foster increased visibility, access to new markets, and enhanced network effects, all of which contribute to a token’s ranking and growth potential.

When evaluating community engagement and adoption metrics, it is essential to consider the community’s quality, depth, and diversity. A highly engaged and diverse community with active participation from developers, enthusiasts, and ecosystem contributors can drive network effects, innovation, and overall ecosystem growth.

Tokenomics and Utility Analysis

Tokenomics refers to the economic design and utility of Web3 tokens within the blockchain ecosystem. Tokenomics encompasses various factors, including token distribution, utility within the ecosystem, staking mechanisms, and reward structures. 

Token Distribution: The distribution of tokens among holders plays a vital role in evaluating a token’s potential. A well-distributed token with a broad base of holders may indicate a more decentralized ecosystem, reducing the risk of centralized control. On the other hand, a concentrated token distribution may lead to potential manipulation or governance issues.

Utility within the Ecosystem: Tokens with multiple use cases and broad utility tend to have higher demand and adoption. The utility can range from being a medium of exchange for goods and services to granting access to platform features, voting rights, or governance participation. Tokens that serve as the lifeblood of their respective ecosystems are likely to have a stronger ranking.

Staking and Rewards: Tokens that offer staking mechanisms and rewards for holding or participating in network activities can drive engagement and incentivize long-term participation. Staking allows token holders to lock up their tokens to secure the network, participate in governance, or earn additional rewards. A token with an attractive staking model and rewarding structure may attract more holders and contribute to its ranking.

Token Burn and Deflationary Mechanisms: Some tokens incorporate deflationary mechanisms, such as token burn, where they permanently remove a portion of the tokens from circulation. This approach can increase scarcity and potentially drive up token value over time. 

Economic Model and Supply Dynamics: Evaluating a token’s economic model and supply dynamics is crucial. Factors such as token emission rate, maximum supply, and inflationary/deflationary mechanisms impact a token’s long-term viability and scarcity. Tokens with well-designed economic models that balance supply and demand are more likely to maintain value and rank positively.

Network Activity and On-Chain Metrics

Network activity and on-chain metrics provide insights into a token’s underlying blockchain network’s activity, usage, and overall health. 

Block Confirmations: Analyzing block confirmations helps assess the efficiency and security of a blockchain network. Faster block confirmations indicate a more scalable and efficient network, enabling swift transaction settlements. Tokens associated with networks that demonstrate reliable and rapid block confirmations may rank higher due to enhanced user experience and network reliability.

Decentralization Metrics: Evaluating decentralization metrics such as the distribution of network nodes, validators, or consensus mechanisms is crucial. Tokens associated with decentralized networks are often preferred due to the reduced risk of centralization and potential vulnerabilities. Networks with a diverse set of validators and nodes contribute to the security, robustness, and overall ranking of a token.

Gas Fees: Gas fees represent the cost required to execute transactions or smart contracts on the blockchain. Analyzing gas fees provides insights into the network’s scalability and affordability. Tokens associated with networks offering lower gas fees or innovative scaling solutions may rank higher, providing more accessible and cost-effective user experiences.

Smart Contract Activity: Assessing the usage and adoption of smart contracts associated with a token’s blockchain provides valuable insights into the network’s versatility and utility. Tokens related to blockchain networks that exhibit a high volume of smart contract activity may indicate a thriving ecosystem with diverse applications, contributing positively to their ranking.

It’s important to interpret these metrics within the context of the specific token and its ecosystem. Different tokens may have unique network dynamics, usage patterns, and requirements.


Ranking Web3 tokens requires quantitative analysis, qualitative assessment, and market understanding. It is a dynamic and ongoing process that investors must approach with diligence, research, and a critical mindset. By considering the various metrics and factors discussed in this article, investors and enthusiasts can navigate the Web3 ecosystem more effectively and identify tokens that align with their investment objectives and risk tolerance.


What role does token distribution play in ranking Web3 tokens?

Token distribution is essential in ranking Web3 tokens as it indicates the level of decentralization and fairness within a network. Tokens distributed more widely among diverse holders are often considered more favorable.

How does the network's governance mechanism affect the ranking of Web3 tokens?

Tokens that offer robust and inclusive governance processes, allowing token holders to participate actively in decision-making, are often considered more valuable and may rank higher.

What are some key indicators of a token's utility in the Web3 ecosystem?

Token utility is based on factors such as its use within the network, its role in facilitating transactions or accessing services, and its ability to unlock certain functionalities or benefits. Tokens with a wide range of utility tend to rank higher.

What role does interoperability play in the ranking of Web3 tokens?

Tokens that offer seamless integration and compatibility with multiple platforms rank higher due to their increased utility.

How does the team behind a Web3 token influence its ranking?

Tokens associated with reputable and accomplished teams with a track record of successful projects are often perceived as more reliable and may rank higher.

Can the token's historical performance affect its ranking?

Tokens with a strong historical performance and positive growth trajectory may rank higher.

What role does regulatory compliance play in the ranking of Web3 tokens?

Tokens that demonstrate adherence to relevant regulations and compliance standards are often viewed as more reliable and may rank higher due to reduced regulatory risks.

Disclaimer. The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

Share link:

Damilola Lawrence

Damilola is a crypto enthusiast, content writer, and journalist. When he is not writing, he spends most of his time reading and keeping tabs on exciting projects in the blockchain space. He also studies the ramifications of Web3 and blockchain development to have a stake in the future economy.

Stay on top of crypto news, get daily updates in your inbox

Related News

Subscribe to CryptoPolitan