Just when you thought that finance and meme culture could be separated, it seems that there has been a link between them. Billy Markus, who is one of the co-founders of Dogecoin, has proposed an uncommon financial metric for Bitcoin, and the whole community of cryptocurrency is discussing this subject. Famous for his sardonic approach to crypto-currency, Markus came out with the price of $69.420, a figure devoid of any economic value, yet gaining its fame due to being meme-number, a phenomenon that highlights memes in the center of memesphere and setting them as the standards of what is regarded as valuable in the digital universe.
A meme-inspired valuation
Markus’s number is not only the product of his imagination but is truly a meme that has played an epic role in the internet culture, including that of the cryptocurrency cabal. This speedy estimation amusingly raised some followers’ interest, until one came up with an idea of increasing it to $694200, to which Markus just replied yes, without further comments. This dialogue represents a glimpse of the rather one-of-a-kind and fanciful bio that makes up the crypto-world, where besides value attributed to the social consensus and trends, value is allocated to traditional financial metrics too.
The market’s response
Interestingly, the market seems to have conceded; it plays with Markus’s meme inspired valuation. The price of bitcoin surged appealingly close … It was achieved on October 22 when it reached $67,700, with a 6% increase compared to the week’s beginning. This social media and community participation spot lights the enormous impact that social platforms have on the crypto currency markets. Observed by the traditional market this may somehow be overlooked but, cryptocurrencies prices has a great dependency on community sentiment.
The value of ideas and the interrelation of the two concepts
While Markus’s comments were made in jest, they underscore a deeper truth about the cryptocurrency market: the remarkable effect of social media and hilarious memes interpretation of market sentiment and valuation. It is actually Dogecoin, a currency that regarded as a joke initially, that held a great match among digital currencies, portraying the potential of community and memes in the accomplishment of crypto-currencies. The market’s reply and rejoinder by Markus are an evidence of the dynamism of value in the day and age of cryptocurrencies where traditionally derived finance principles are encountering with the viral nature of the Internet age.
Throughout the week, this point became more clear to me as I watched the factors that can influence the currency in addition to emphasizing the cultural and social dynamics that can affect market movements. Since digital currencies are not imperial, the correlation between Internet culture and financial valuation will probably stay as the central topic, which would only cause the changes of the ideas about what factor denotes value of the digital economy.
