AI-Created Video Wins in Pink Floyd Contest, Stirring Controversy Among Fans

In this post:

  • The AI-created a video winning the Pink Floyd’s contes ignited the discussion in tech-driven art where the ethics in creative sectors shone.
  • Fans as well as artists express their discontentment regarding AI recognition in art because such attitudes are thought may possibly undermine human creativity and orthodox artistic values.
  • Regardless, the human artists take leadership, winning main awards that may mean a symbiosis AI and art-making.

Pink Floyd, the household band for rock revolution,with one of his album , “The Dark Side of the Moon,” are now a serious cause of the debates. The showband organized a competition around the 50th anniversary of the record, giving its guests an open platform to submit videos for every single track that is on the record. Nevertheless, the consideration that gave one of the winning spaces to an AI-generated video sparked a revolt in a large number of fans and artists with the whole world Shuddering

Ethical debate over AI created video in pink floyd celebratory competition

The video set for “Any Color You Like” performed by Damián Gaume adopted AI tools and the discussion that ensued reverberated on how ethics and implications of using AI in the creative front affected engineering and manufacturing decisions. 

Gaume provided that he resorted to the Stable Diffusion Large Language Model, which is one of the computer-generated systems to create the art. However, he chose to train his own models by educating them in his peculiar models, instead of giving it the liberty to search the internet. 

However the community has expressed a lot of rejection concerning the issue among those who feel it is unethical to easily sidelined contemporary artists in this manner, who identify deeply with their works.

Some critics of incorporating AI in the most popular event contestation are that it thwarts the recognition of human creative and ability work. Find the mistakes in the sentence: The critics conclude that the introduction of AI in the most prestigious event competition will dethrone the recognition of human creative and capable work. 

To this day, the video‘s YouTube comments and social media posts praise the work but express a shared feeling of disappointment and hurt. Those comments refer to (Pink Floyd) ‘s 40-year-long history of working with people and teams of animators. The controversy sparked debates on the meaning and boundaries of AI art, whether arts or crafts industries can have their future stabilized by AI, and ethical questions related to AI technology utilizing human-made objects as a training grounds for itself.

AI’s role and human creativity celebrated in Pink Floyd’s Video competition

Journalist Carolyn Hinds and guitar YouTuber Andy ‘Guitar Geek’ Farris are among the most vocal advocates of this argument saying that the being compared to machines creates a system of unfairness which takes away the individual’s ownership of certain things. 

The controversy has bought up the likelihood of such occurrences hence, the issue has sparked off important concern of the risks involved.

Digital curation might have both positive and negative connotations, such as AI introduction to the art world, risking traditional forms of art and further ethical issues.

However, the dingy-sounding video was nowhere to be seen in the top three and did not even go home with the cash prize. The competition rewarded the videos created by a human with £100,000 prize for “Brain Damage”, which Dabrundashvili and Nikitina produced. 

The “Time” by David Horne and Monica Fibbi’s “Eclipse” got second place in runners-up award showing that judges appreciated human creativity and effort.

Scarfe, who is world famous for designing hand-drawn animations for Pink Floyd’s “The Wall-vinyl” album cover, was, at the time, a part of the judging panel. Their decision had everyone questioning them.

AI innovation and the future of human creativity in the arts 

While the rewards given to the non-AI entries hint at the continued appreciation for the traditional skill of artisanship, there is no doubt that the AI-based artists are getting their due share of space and recognition.

This scene is nothing but a tiny part of the conversations and concerns happening in the large society in general on AI in the arts. There are plenty of new opportunities and ways of thinking created by technology but as the time goes on the creative community gets challenged by the emerging traditions and behavioral patterns. 

The response to Pink Crimson’s selection discloses the fact that the tension exists between the extreme acceptance of the new devices and the preservation of dignity and evaluation of human occupations.

The debates on AI and artwork are not new, they are getting to the tipping point but this question is not that simple, there are various ethical, moral, and practical issues to be considered and there is a lot of careful thinking to be done. 

The off-pink-and-alien drama centering on “The Dark Side of the Moon” competition has touched upon the need for continuous dialogue and careful consideration of new technologies. The result is that the arts are increasingly dynamic, diversified, and, ultimately, human.

Disclaimer. The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

Share link:

Most read

Loading Most Read articles...

Stay on top of crypto news, get daily updates in your inbox

Related News

Subscribe to CryptoPolitan