- The CFTC sued Utah on October 27 to block the state from enforcing gambling laws against federally licensed prediction-market exchanges.
- The lawsuit comes a week after Utah sued Kalshi and two Susquehanna firms.
- The fight matters to a business Artemis valued at $419.1 billion in trailing one-year volume, with sports contracts at 41.4%, and it may ultimately reach the Supreme Court, as US courts, European regulators, and Asian authorities disagree on whether event contracts are derivatives or bets.
On October 27, 2026, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed a lawsuit against the state of Utah to prevent it from enforcing its gambling laws on prediction markets operating under federal jurisdiction.
For prediction exchange operators, such as Kalshi, the issue is larger than Utah’s gambling laws. The question is whether these prediction markets can work within the framework of a single set of federal regulations or whether they have to abide by specific gambling laws of every state.
Two lawsuits pointing in opposite directions
On October 20, 2026, Utah Attorney General Derek Brown filed a lawsuit against five entities owned by Kalshi and Susquehanna for the alleged facilitation of illegal gambling. The state sought an injunction and restoration of losses and various fees estimated to be between $30.6 million and $61.2 million. According to Cryptopolitan, naming Susquehanna broadens the legal battle to the market makers, who are the providers of liquidity and trades.
Kalshi claims that its contracts are derivatives that are regulated under federal jurisdiction. But Utah states that the Commodity Exchange Act still allows room for state gambling laws. The new case being brought by the CFTC puts that disagreement in a federal-state showdown.
An August ruling and 44 states push back
The federal argument has faced challenges in the courtroom. On August 4, a federal judge in Utah ruled that the Act does not prevent states from enforcing its laws. Appellate courts have different decisions. The Third Circuit supported Kalshi in New Jersey. The Ninth Circuit supported Nevada, and the Sixth Circuit sided with Ohio and Tennessee.
Opposition has not just been confined to the courts. In July, 44 state attorneys general contested the authority of the CFTC over contracts related to sports. On October 9, 2026, the agency suggested classifying some event contracts as swaps. This rule is not final yet.
Furthermore, the CFTC is suing states directly. Utah is the tenth state that it has filed suit against after states Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, New York, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Rhode Island, New Mexico, and Kentucky.
What a $419.1 billion business stands to lose
The legal dispute can have significant financial consequences. Artemis reports that the prediction market registered trading volume of $419.1 billion for the year up to October 27, 2026. Sports contracts took the top share at $173.6 billion (41.4%), followed by exotics at $149.3 billion and crypto at $60.3 billion.
Kalshi has plenty riding on sports contracts. Reuters reported the company’s valuation at roughly $40 billion, while CEO Tarek Mansour said sports still account for nearly 65% of its revenue, down from around 95% nine months earlier.
A patchwork of state rules could make these contracts more expensive to offer or restrict access in certain markets. Legal pressure on liquidity providers could also widen trading spreads and reduce market activity. So far, however, there is no evidence that Susquehanna has withdrawn from Kalshi.
Europe restricts, Asia hesitates
The US is not alone in trying to draw the line between financial trading and gambling. In July, ESMA warned that event contracts classified as derivatives fall under existing retail binary-option bans. Firms distributing these products also need authorization as investment firms, while national gambling laws may still apply.
Asia faces a similar challenge. Tiger Research warns that restrictive regulations could drive trading activity offshore and leave users without adequate protection, even as major technology companies show growing interest in prediction markets.
Mansour told Reuters the dispute could reach the Supreme Court and expressed confidence in Kalshi’s position. But New Jersey—not Kalshi—petitioned the justices after losing in the Third Circuit. The Court has not agreed to hear the case.
For now, watch Utah’s federal lawsuit, Kalshi’s appeal, and the CFTC’s pending swaps proposal.
Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.
FAQs
Why did the CFTC sue Utah?
The agency asked a federal court to stop Utah from applying its gambling laws to exchanges the CFTC licenses, part of a broader dispute over whether event contracts are federally regulated derivatives or state-regulated bets.
How big is the prediction-market business?
Artemis data as of October 27 showed $419.1 billion in trailing one-year trading volume, with sports contracts the largest category at $173.6 billion, or 41.4%
Could the dispute reach the Supreme Court?
Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour told Reuters the clash could eventually reach the Supreme Court; the company won an appeals-court ruling in New Jersey and has sought Supreme Court review, but no case has been accepted.
Disclaimer. The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.
Ibiam Wayas
Ibiam Wayas has covered the crypto news beat since 2019. He studied Computer Science at National Open University of Nigeria. His work has appeared on various crypto news platforms, including Coinfomania, Crypto News Australia, and AltcoinBuzz. Drawing on his background in Computer Science, he now focuses on crypto, robotics, and longevity news.
