LATEST NEWS
SELECTED FOR YOU

EU set to propose social media and AI chatbot ban for under-15s

ByIbiam WayasIbiam Wayas 4 mins read
EU's latest data center tender set to put continent further behind in AI race
  • The EU is expected to propose rules restricting under-15s from social media and AI chatbots.
  • This builds on a July expert report and a privacy-preserving age verification tool the Commission finished in April.
  • If adopted, it would push consumer AI companies toward age-segmented products and higher compliance costs, even as overall AI spending keeps growing.

The European Union is putting together a proposal to establish guidelines under which children below the age of 15 would be prohibited from using social media, video-sharing platforms, AI chat services, and online games. If this proposal becomes law, its provisions will be set out in the EU Kids Act and will require the verification of users’ ages by tech companies as a condition of granting users access to their services. However, this is only a proposal at the moment and needs to be approved first by EU member countries and the European Parliament.

For AI businesses, the next step is uncertain. In Europe, the countries will likely start promoting services based on the age issue, making consumer AI companies invest in age verification, parental control options, and keeping the services for minors separate from those for adults. However, it is expected that larger companies will be able to absorb these costs more easily than their smaller competitors.

Why the panel report matters now

The foundation for this policy comes from a report dated July that was released by Prof. Dr. Jörg M. Fegert and Dr. Maria Melchior, Co-Chairs of the European Commission’s Special Panel on Online Child Safety. Their appointments came in March after Ursula von der Leyen first raised the matter during her State of the Union speech of 2025.

The panel conducted three meetings from March to June and used information received from academics, representatives of young people and parents, and institutions from EU and other nations, such as Australia and Brazil.

In their report, the panel classifies risky AI systems, such as AI companions, into a larger group of products that they call “social media+,” which includes services that have unlimited scrolling, autoplay, and recommendation algorithm features. Through this larger classification, it is easier to understand why the panel sees age restriction as a potential safety measure even though the safety issues have yet to be resolved.

According to Fegert and Melchior, age restrictions “may be a necessary precautionary step” until it is established that social media+ spaces are effective and do not pose a risk for children.

Their recommendation does not mean banning access to the products. It solely transfers the responsibility to the companies that have to prove the safety of their products for young clients before access restrictions can be loosened.

Age assurance is the lever that makes it work

It’s hard to enforce an age limit when reliable age-verification methods are unavailable. The Commission published a document on July 14, 2025, to provide its age-verification solution. The solution reached full working condition by April 15, 2026.

The privacy-preserving “mini wallet” doesn’t require users to reveal themselves or disclose any personal information when they want to show that they meet a certain age limit. It is designed to verify age for users aged 18+, but it can also be adapted for age limits of 13+.

Member states are expected to have the necessary tools by the end of 2026. The Commission plans to launch an EU Age Verification Scheme that will connect reliable service providers and solutions which will create a new compliance market for identity, privacy, and assurance services.

Minors already lean on AI

Any restriction on AI usage will have an impact on the youth audience that has already been developed. According to the 2026 census of Common Sense Media, which was conducted on 1,204 U.S. children in the age range of 9 to 17, 86% have used or interacted with AI solutions, while more than 20% of them use AI solutions almost every day.

Regular users report their feelings of higher loneliness and lower happiness but the researchers underline that, due to the design of the survey, it is impossible to identify if the use of AI brings about these consequences.

Companies producing AI solutions are already going in the direction of developing age-restricted products. For example, as it was reported by Cryptopolitan, OpenAI has already launched ChatGPT for Teens, which is designed for people aged 13-17, while restricting children under 13.

Block access, or police the chatbot

Europe is not the only one taking action. The U.S. and California are also developing child safety regulations, but they are focusing more on the behavior of platforms and chatbots than on outright blocking access.

On June 29, 2026, the U.S. House passed the KIDS Act with a vote of 267 to 117. This will force chatbots to identify themselves as non-human entities while providing mental-health resources and prompting users to take breaks.

California has gone even further since on September 10 Governor Gavin Newsom signed a set of laws related to child safety. These laws will force chatbots to use crisis response guidelines as well as submit to independent audits on the subject of child safety and control mechanisms for social media for users under the age of 16.

However, the EU approach is more stringent in that rather than relying mainly on the safety of products, it also makes age verification mandatory.

EU vs US vs California: Child Online Safety and AI Chatbot Rules Compared

Who absorbs the cost

The market itself is still expanding. Gartner expects worldwide spending on AI models and platforms to reach $64 billion in 2026, up 63.4% from 2025. Sensor Tower projects time spent on generative AI apps to more than double from 17.2 billion hours in H1 2025 to 36 billion in H1 2026.

That makes regulation less a brake on AI demand than a redistribution of costs. Large platforms are better positioned to fund age checks, audits and youth-specific product design. Smaller consumer AI firms face steeper compliance barriers, while age-verification, AI-safety and compliance providers could emerge as beneficiaries.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

FAQs

Is the EU ban on under-15s already in force?

No. It is a proposed direction informed by the Special Panel's July 2026 report, which the Commission says is meant to shape future action rather than serve as the rule itself.

How would the EU check a user's age?

Through a privacy-preserving age verification tool, nicknamed the "mini wallet," that became feature-ready on 15 April 2026 and lets users prove an age threshold without sharing other personal information; the Commission has asked member states to roll out age verification by the end of 2026.

How does the US approach differ from the EU's?

The US has focused on how chatbots behave rather than blocking access: the KIDS Act, passed by the House on 29 June 2026, requires chatbots to flag they are not human and share mental-health resources, while California's "Adam's Law," signed September 10, mandates crisis protocols and safety audits.

Share this article

Disclaimer. The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

Ibiam Wayas

Ibiam Wayas

Ibiam Wayas has covered the crypto news beat since 2019. He studied Computer Science at National Open University of Nigeria. His work has appeared on various crypto news platforms, including Coinfomania, Crypto News Australia, and AltcoinBuzz. Drawing on his background in Computer Science, he now focuses on crypto, robotics, and longevity news.

MORE … NEWS