Question 1

中国の最高人民法院は、AI ディープフェイクについてどのように決定したのでしょうか？

Accepted Answer

The court issued guidelines stating that creating or distributing recognizable AI replicas of a person's face or voice without consent is an infringement, and that using such fakes to spread false claims or damage a reputation can bring legal liability.

Question 2

新しい規則の下で、AI 企業やユーザーは責任を問われる可能性がありますか？

Accepted Answer

Yes. An AI provider that is notified its system generated infringing content but fails to act in time can be liable, and a user who deliberately prompts a model into producing harmful infringing content can be held responsible.

Question 3

中国における AI による顔盗難の紛争はどの程度一般的ですか？

Accepted Answer

The Guangzhou Internet Court alone has heard about 700 AI-related face-theft cases over three years, and ByteDance said it removed more than 85,000 videos involving unauthorized AI reproductions of people's faces and voices since the start of 2026.

Douyin

中国の最高裁判所、AIディープフェイクと不当な価格設定に関する責任ルールを制定

鋭い要約を。
毎日。

Douyin

中国の最高裁判所、AIディープフェイクと不当な価格設定に関する責任ルールを制定

鋭い要約を。毎日。

鋭い要約を。
毎日。