LATEST NEWS
SELECTED FOR YOU

Could Ethereum’s Glamsterdam upgrade slip beyond December?

ByAshish KumarAshish Kumar 3 mins read
Could Ethereum’s Glamsterdam upgrade slip beyond December?
  • Ethereum delayed the Glamsterdam testnet fork over gas-accounting security risks.

  • ChainSecurity flagged 13 potentially vulnerable smart contracts.

  • The October 26 Hoodi activation was postponed, putting the planned December mainnet launch in doubt.

Ethereum developers delayed the Glamsterdam hard fork deployment on the Hoodi testnet after security experts identified potential gas-accounting adjustments, which could affect the functioning of currently deployed smart contracts during failed transactions.

Thus, the latest update delays Ethereum’s upcoming mainnet hard fork activation indefinitely and casts doubts about its tentative December rollout window.

Glamsterdam timeline in doubt

According to the Ethereum Foundation, the development team delayed the activation due to security concerns in a blog post on Thursday. As the Foundation stated, developers made a joint decision to postpone the update during the ACDE #248 call to evaluate the interaction between the EIP-8037 proposal and currently deployed smart contracts on the mainnet.

Initially, the Hoodi hard fork was set to be activated on October 26 at 17:42:48 UTC at epoch 132,352. Now, this epoch has been removed from the deployment configuration without any new epoch being scheduled.

Additionally, the delay affects the deployment of the Gloas consensus-layer activation and a planned increase in the current Hoodi gas limit to 200 million as part of the Glamsterdam hard fork update package. However, the Foundation emphasized that the schedule change would not affect Hoodi’s existing chain history.

How the gas changes could backfire

This issue goes back to October 13, when blockchain auditing company ChainSecurity marked two proposals from Glamsterdam, namely EIP-8037 and EIP-8038, as a threat to current measures to prevent what it calls “insufficient gas griefing.” As per the attack, the caller sends insufficient gas deliberately so that a legitimate contract function fails.

It will be possible, with the introduction of these measures, to return gas to a contract once an operation fails, thus allowing further operation which otherwise would have stopped.

Many contracts use an amount of gas remaining in the middle of a transaction as one of the security measures. Altering that assumption, it will be possible for the contract to finalize the failed operation, making it impossible for a user to claim anything or perform another operation.

Some gas checks will withstand despite all changes, but it will be necessary to audit them for Glamsterdam’s new accounting system.

13 real-world contracts flagged

ChainSecurity stated on Friday that it discovered 13 cases of potentially exposed contracts in the real world and was engaging in responsible disclosure with the concerned projects. While ChainSecurity did not reveal the affected projects or details of the discovered cases, it advised developers to assess their contracts urgently.

The news made a strong impact on community members. Pseudonymous developer pcaversaccio commented on October 21 on GitHub that the situation was “serious” and that the fork must be re-evaluated.

Additionally, the announcement comes in the wake of a previous warning by the Ethereum Foundation that Glamsterdam’s new gas pricing mechanism might affect wallets, indexers, and gas estimators operating under fixed assumptions.

Glamsterdam launched on the Sepolia testnet on October 6, while Hoodi was the next checkpoint expected before the mainnet launch.

Initially, the team planned a mainnet launch in December depending on successful testing of the Hoodi testnet. However, since Hoodi is no longer a possibility, the proposed December release should not be viewed as a deadline.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

FAQs

Why did Ethereum delay the Glamsterdam upgrade on Hoodi?

ChainSecurity flagged that gas-accounting changes in EIP-8037 and EIP-8038 could undermine protections against insufficient gas griefing, and developers want to study how those changes affect contracts already deployed on mainnet.

When was Glamsterdam supposed to activate on Hoodi?

It was scheduled for October 26 at 17:42:48 UTC (epoch 132,352), but the Ethereum Foundation removed that slot and has not announced a replacement date.

Does the delay affect Ethereum mainnet or ETH holders?

No. The Ethereum Foundation said the postponement concerns Hoodi only, does not set a mainnet activation date, and requires no action from mainnet users or ETH holders.

Share this article

Disclaimer. The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

Ashish Kumar

Ashish Kumar

Ashish Kumar is a crypto and financial journalist with eight years of newsroom experience. He covers what’s happening with crypto markets, regulation, DeFi, and exchange ecosystems. He has worked with Coingape, Todayq, and Newsroompost. Ashish holds a PGDP in English Journalism from the IIMC. He has also interviewed industry figures including Arthur Hayes, Yat Siu, Austin Federa, and more.

MORE … NEWS