Amended crypto manipulation lawsuit against Bitfinex, Tether, now drags Bittrex and Poloniex

eos investors

A leading digital currency exchange, Bitfinex and the people behind Tether (USDT) have been called up to court again following an amended crypto manipulation lawsuit filed against them on Wednesday. This time, the plaintiffs included two popular crypto exchanges, Poloniex and Bittrex, as being faulty as well.

Plaintiffs amend their crypto manipulation lawsuit

On June 3, the plaintiffs filed the lawsuit with the Southern District Court of New York, alleging that the defendants – Tether and its sister company, Bitfinex – willingly manipulated the digital currency market. This crypto manipulation lawsuit against the two companies was initially tabled in October, last year.

The plaintiffs claimed in those fillings that Tether issued several units (billions) of its stablecoin (USDT) without any backing with the United States dollars. This meant that they released the stablecoins out of nowhere. 

Moving forward, the filing noted that Tether went ahead to sell those stablecoins it created to its sister company, Bitfinex, in order to hide that fact. Given that the exchange and Tether were seemingly related, new USDT could be transferred to Tether’s account with Bitfinex, without any exchange of US dollars, as required from other customers, the plaintiffs claimed.

The recently amended 156-page crypto manipulation lawsuit further dragged Poloniex and Bittrex exchanges. It accused them of being aware that Bitfinex was moving unbacked Tether stablecoins to their respective platform, yet they accepted it.

Initial filing mentioned $1.4 trillion as damage

According to the filing, the two digital currency exchanges received these transfers, which enabled the lead defendants to sell unbacked stablecoins as crypto-commodities on their platform. This spiked the USDT prices, causing damages worth $1.4 trillion, as the plaintiffs claimed in the initial crypto manipulation lawsuit.

Having made revisions in the plaintiffs’ list to include Matthew Script, a cryptocurrency trader, and exclude David Leibowitz, including one of the defendants named in the initial filing, the entire plaintiffs want “reasonable costs of suit, pre- and post-judgment interest, and reasonable attorneys’ fees,” including a trial by jury for their claims.

Ibiam Wayas

Ibiam Wayas

Ibiam is an optimistic crypto journalist. Five years from now, he sees himself establishing a unique crypto media outlet that will breach the gap between the crypto world and the general public. He loves to associate with like-minded individuals and collaborate with them on similar projects. He spends much of his time honing his writing and critical thinking skills.

Related News

Hot Stories

How to Stake Kava: Is 110% APY on BUSD legit?
Avalanche price analysis: AVAX continues to move upwards with $35 target
How to Stake on Uniswap: A Quick Guide to Passive Income
Aave price analysis: AAVE increases value by 3.5% after strong bullish movement
Ethereum price analysis: ETH wobbles near $1,700 as bulls desperate to touch $1,800

Follow Us

Industry News

Elon Musk drags Twitter to court for fraud
Binance CEO Urges To Move Funds From WazirX To Binance
Bitcoin falls to $23K on U.S. jobs report
How are the top cryptocurrencies selected?
Voyager Digital set to refund users with a $270 million fund