Nearly every major company in America has rushed to put artificial intelligence agents to work over the past year, but the technology is delivering far less than promised while creating serious new problems inside organizations, according to new research and industry experts.
Almost all business leaders, 97 percent, say their companies put AI agents into operation during the past 12 months, with 52 percent of employees already using them. But fewer than three in ten are seeing any real financial benefit from the expensive technology.Â
The gap between what companies spent and what they got back has left 54 percent of top executives saying the whole effort is tearing their organizations apart.
“The biggest problem that we’re working with in AI right now” comes from companies thinking every task needs to run through costly AI systems, said Kevin McGrath, who runs AI startup Meibel. He told a Silicon Valley conference this week that businesses “just give all of your tokens and all of your money to an AI Claw bot that will just waste millions and millions of tokens.”
The warnings came during two separate technology gatherings in California this week, where engineers and company leaders laid out the real problems behind the AI agent hype.
 A survey of 1,200 top executives and 1,200 employees conducted by WRITER found that 79 percent of companies face challenges adopting AI, a double-digit jump from 2025. This is happening even though 59 percent spend more than one million dollars each year on AI technology.
Two-Thirds of companies report security breaches
The security picture looks alarming. Two-thirds of executives believe their companies have already experienced data leaks or security breaches because workers used unapproved AI tools.
 More than one-third, 36 percent, have no formal plan for watching over their AI agents. Another 35 percent admitted they could not immediately shut down an AI agent if it went rogue. Thirty-five percent of employees have entered company secrets into public AI tools.
Deep Shah, a software engineer at Google, explained that “there are multiple challenges you will find when you try to deploy that system at scale.” He pointed to costs as the first major obstacle. Running AI agents requires constant spending, and poorly designed systems end up burning cash instead of saving it.
The problem goes beyond technical issues. Three-quarters of executives confessed their company’s AI strategy exists “more for show” than as actual guidance for employees.
Nearly half, 48 percent, called their AI adoption efforts a “massive disappointment.” Another 39 percent lack any formal plan to drive revenue from AI tools. The pressure has gotten so intense that 73 percent of chief executives report stress or anxiety about their company’s AI strategy, with 64 percent fearing they could lose their jobs if they fail to lead the transition.
Only 29 percent see real returns despite heavy use
Meanwhile, a separate analysis by Lyzr AI based on 200,000 user interactions, 3,000 demo requests, and 2,000 conversations with business and tech leaders found that 62 percent of companies exploring AI agents lack a clear starting point. Another 41 percent treat them as side projects. Thirty-two percent stall after pilot programs and never reach full operation.
Chris Han, who helps run ThinkingAI in China, said popular tools like OpenClaw cannot meet corporate needs. Business users need to figure out memory management, agent teams, and communications, tasks that the current tools handle poorly.
Only 29 percent of organizations report significant returns from generative AI, and just 23 percent from AI agents, even though 70 percent of employees and 94 percent of top leaders use AI tools for at least 30 minutes every day. Sixty-four percent of executives spend two hours or more with the technology daily.
