The Governor of Connecticut, Ned Lamont, has banned public officers from using Bitcoin and other crypto assets. In a bill signed June 30th, the governor also prevented the state’s storage, exchange, and transactions.
The law, now known as House Bill 7082 or Public Act 25‑66, passed the state House and Senate without opposition as the House voted 148–0, and the Senate voted 36–0 to go through easily.
However, some believe the acceleration to the bill’s passing is not unconnected to the Democrats’ overwhelming majority in Connecticut, especially amid the consistent criticism of President Trump’s involvement with memecoins and digital finance since he came on board as President.
This criticism likely influenced the state’s decision to regulate cryptocurrencies more strictly. The bill, which was referred to the House Committee on Banking in February 2025, was passed on June 30th and will come into full effect from October 1st, 2025.
The law stated new rules for crypto businesses to follow, which include that any entity trading virtual currencies, including crypto transactions, digital wallets, and Bitcoin Exchanges, must get a license from the State Banking Commissioner.
Such entities must also explain clear risk warnings to consumers, issue receipts after each transaction, and strictly follow anti‑money‑laundering rules. If they allow minors to trade, they must have gotten their parents’ consent beforehand.
Connecticut’s conservative stance on crypto and Bitcoin investments and trading is coming after several of its neighbouring states in the US continue to support creating a Bitcoin reserve to hold a portion of their wealth.
Supporters say the law will protect citizens from exploitation and risks
According to supporters of the law, House Bill 7082 is meant to help protect users from being exploited due to the volatility of cryptocurrencies, especially for underage people. Also, the law is created to help protect Connecticut’s money and resources from unnecessary risks.
However, industry enthusiasts do not agree, noting that while the law might protect citizens due to the unregulated side of crypto, if not done carefully, it could stifle innovation in a growing creative industry. Others are more critical of the move, describing it as an action that will hurt taxpayers.
Meanwhile, some believe the law is simply a statement and the state will eventually reverse its decision in the next few years once it sees its costs. Crypto attorney Aaron Brogan is among those who think the law does nothing of substance in the long run.
Connecticut says No, when other US states are saying Yes
With Connecticut deciding to ban its government from using or investing in Cryptocurrency, it is going away from what other neighbouring and high-profile states are doing. Most of these states already use Bitcoin as a store of value and investment for their assets.
In June, Texas made a bold move in crypto. Its governor, Greg Abbot, ratified a bill known as Senate Bill 21 that allows Texas to create a strategic reserve for Bitcoin. This immediately made Texas the latest US state to create a Bitcoin Reserve while officially allocating $10 million to Bitcoin.
According to its lawmakers, this prepares the state for the inevitable future of digital finance, where it will become a part and parcel of its economy and the global economy. They also believe this step will help protect their funds from inflation and instability, which will help grow Texas financially in the long run.
Arizona and New Hampshire have passed similar bills to set up a strategic Bitcoin and digital assets reserve fund, which their lawmakers believe will help them stay ahead of new technologies and not get left behind. Interestingly, New Hampshire also has laws that support using digital assets as innovation tools to bring financial freedom.
