Bybit detects and blocks coordinated fake deposit attacks, preventing over $1B DOT in potential losses

- Bybit’s Group Risk Control team has detected and blocked coordinated fake deposit attacks across multiple blockchain networks, preventing over $1B in DOT losses.
- All attempts were identified and neutralized in real time, hence no funds were incorrectly credited, and no users were affected.
- Bybit has continued to strengthen its risk control infrastructure through advanced transaction analysis, balanced validation, and ownership-aware tracking.
Bybit’s Group Risk Control team has detected and blocked coordinated fake deposit attacks across multiple blockchain networks, preventing losses of over $1B in DOT. All attempts were identified and neutralized in real time; hence, no funds were incorrectly credited, and no users were affected.
According to the GRC team, the fake deposit attacks targeting multiple blockchain networks employed sophisticated techniques to exploit vulnerabilities in deposit scanning systems. The attacks are designed to deceive exchange systems into crediting funds that were never actually received.
These attacks also exploited how transactions are processed and validated. They allowed the transactions to appear legitimate while failing or resulting in no actual balance change.
However, David Zong, the head of Group Risk Control and Security at Bybit, confirmed that Bybit validates transactions at every level of execution regardless of structure or technique. Each transaction is broken down into its atomic components and verified independently, ensuring that only genuine deposits are credited.
Zong explains Bybit’s deposit monitoring system
According to Zong, Bybit’s deposit monitoring system validates transactions, whether attackers use batch calls, relayed transactions, multi-instruction flows, or ownership manipulation. The system ensures that only genuine asset movements are recognized.
In one incident, attackers exploited batch transaction mechanisms to combine multiple transfers into a single operation. A large transfer was structured to fail while smaller transfers within the bath succeeded. Systems that rely solely on overall transaction status could misinterpret such activity as a valid deposit.
On the other hand, attackers used multi-step transactions combined with ownership changes to simulate the appearance of incoming funds, even though there was no actual net balance increase. Systems that depend on transaction logs rather than actual balance validation may incorrectly identify these as legitimate deposits.
Bybit’s deposit monitoring system is built on a multi-layered validation framework designed to detect both known and emerging attack patterns. The system ensures that only verifiable asset movements are recognized as deposits.
Bybit continues to strengthen its risk control infrastructure
The GRC team emphasizes that Bybit has continued to strengthen its risk control infrastructure through advanced transaction analysis, balanced validation, and ownership-aware tracking. The exchange ensures resilience against sophisticated attack vectors and safeguards user assets at scale.
Bybit continuously scans complete blockchain data across supported networks, enabling visibility into all transaction types—including complex, batched, and failed transactions. The transactions are filtered against user deposit addresses and related account structures, ensuring that both direct and indirect interactions are captured accurately.
Meanwhile, transactions that deviate from expected patterns are analyzed based on structure, complexity, and potential financial impact. The system assigns a severity level and triggers real-time alerts for immediate investigation.
On the other hand, the GRC team further notes that fake deposit attacks are not new to the crypto industry. Notable incidents include the Mt. Gox transaction malleability exploit (2011–2014), which contributed to the loss of approximately 850,000 BTC. The Silk Road deposit bug exploited in 2012 also resulted in the theft of 51,680 Bitcoin. The attacks detected by Bybit represent a new generation of these exploits, adapted to the unique transaction models of modern blockchain networks.
Disclaimer. The information provided does not, and is not intended to, constitute financial advice; instead, all information, content, and materials are for general informational purposes only. Information may not constitute the most up-to-date information and readers must do their own due diligence and assume responsibility for their own actions. Links to other third-party websites are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; Cryptopolitan and its members do not recommend or endorse contents of the third-party sites.

Cryptopolitan Media
A dedicated desk for curated insights and featured updates from our network of global industry partners.
CRASH COURSE
- Which cryptocurrencies can make you money
- How to boost your security with a wallet (and which ones are actually worth using)
- Little-known investment strategies that the pros use
- How to get started investing in crypto (which exchanges to use, the best crypto to buy etc)














