Dario Durigan, the newly appointed Brazilian Minister of Finance, intends to alter the ministry’s communication strategy and postpone tax measures, including the regulatory protocols for cryptocurrency taxation. Notably, this move comes as the country begins preparations for this year’s presidential election.
Following this report, two sources with knowledge of the matter, who wished to remain anonymous due to the confidential nature of the situation, revealed that Durigan, who took over Fernando Haddad’s role, will prioritize microeconomic regulations over contentious fiscal measures. With this decision in place, the Minister of Finance seeks to maintain his congressional support, they said.
Meanwhile, reports from reliable sources indicate that regulators and government officials’ planned public consultation on crypto tax policy, originally scheduled for this year, may be delayed until 2027. Nonetheless, the two sources stressed that this matter is still under active consideration.
Brazil’s crypto tax regulations spark heated discussions among individuals
Earlier in June last year, Brazil shifted from a no-tax policy to a 17.5% flat tax on small cryptocurrency capital gains. This focus comprises offshore accounts and gains from self-custodial holdings.
At this point, several analysts weighed in on the topic, noting that individuals whose monthly sales volumes did not exceed 35,000 Brazilian reais, roughly $6,587, were exempt from capital gains taxes under the previous regulations. However, those who sold more than this limit faced a tax rate hike from 15% to 22.5%.
This news was released just a few months after Brazil’s central bank and primary monetary authority, the Banco Central do Brasil (BCB), introduced regulations classifying stablecoin transfers as foreign currency exchanges, subjecting them to the same tax laws.
At this time, the Brazilian government was considering taxing cryptocurrencies used for international transfers. This finding sparked heated discussions among individuals, prompting reporters to reach out to government officials for comment.
In response to this request, the officials noted that they are aligning their reporting rules with the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF). CARF is an OECD-developed international standard for the automatic, annual exchange of tax information on transactions in crypto-assets.
Even so, two anonymous officials knowledgeable of the talks emphasized that Brazil’s plan to tax cryptocurrency use in international payments would close a gap in the nation’s normal tax on foreign-exchange transactions.
On the other hand, analysts argued that the pause in crypto tax discussions contradicted the current reality of Brazil’s rapidly expanding crypto industry and its rapid adoption rates. Despite this finding, the nation ranked fifth in Chainalysis’s Global Adoption Index for cryptocurrency. Moreover, it leads Latin America in adoption rates.
Following this accomplishment, analysts argued that the country’s cryptocurrency market has rapidly expanded due to heightened interest in stablecoins among individuals. This was after federal tax authorities shared data showing that crypto transactions in Brazil reached an all-time high of 227 billion reais, equivalent to $42.8 billion, in the first half of 2025. This figure represented a 20% rise compared to the previous year.
At the same time, recent reports highlighted that key crypto and fintech groups in the country raised concerns that applying a financial transaction tax to stablecoins would breach laws and stifle innovation.
Brazil’s crypto market faces significant challenges, sparking tension among individuals
Analysts admitted that Brazil’s crypto market faces significant challenges. This was after sources pointed out that industry groups ABcripto, ABFintechs, Abracam, ABToken, and Zetta warned against the recent discussions to expand the IOF tax (Imposto sobre Operações Financeiras) to include stablecoin transactions.
These organizations represent over 850 Brazilian fintech, virtual asset, and market infrastructure companies. The discussion was centered on a tax levied on specific financial activities, such as foreign exchange operations.
At this point, the associations maintained their view that implementing tax policy on stablecoin transactions would violate existing regulations and negatively impact the country’s crypto industry.
According to them, the Constitution restricts IOF to fiat currency exchanges, and they contend that stablecoins do not fall within this definition.
Moreover, the industry groups stated that Brazil’s Virtual Assets Law, enacted as Law No. 14,478 in 2022, explicitly excludes virtual assets from the classification of national or foreign fiat currency. Hence, they maintain their argument that stablecoins cannot legally be classified as foreign currency under IOF regulations.
