Matthew Sigel, the head of digital assets research at VanEck, a global investment management firm managing billions of assets, believes there is trouble brewing on the horizon for companies in the corporate Bitcoin treasury sweepstakes.
Sigel highlighted the developing issue for Bitcoin treasury companies in a lengthy X post. However, he also shared some alternative solutions for companies nearing the hypothetical danger zone to consider.
$SMLR 👀
— matthew sigel, recovering CFA (@matthew_sigel) June 16, 2025
Sigel sees a problem for Bitcoin treasury companies
Sigel’s post began by highlighting how no public BTC treasury company has yet to trade below its Bitcoin NAV for a sustained period. However, he claimed one is now approaching break-even territory, an emerging risk for some companies that raise capital through large at-the-market (ATM) programs to buy BTC.
According to Sigel, if the stock trades at or near NAV (net asset value), continued equity issuance can dilute rather than create value, which would lead to capital erosion rather than formation.
Under normal circumstances, companies like Semler and Strategy have stock prices that trade above the value of their Bitcoin (at a premium) which means that investors are willing to pay more for the stock than just the Bitcoin it owns.
However, Sigel says at least one company’s stock price is getting very close to its Bitcoin NAV and if the stock price falls to or below the NAV, it’s a red flag.
If the stock price is close to or below NAV, selling new shares becomes self-harming as it dilutes the value for existing shareholders, meaning each share represents a smaller piece of the company’s Bitcoin, something investors don’t like to hear.
At break-even level, offerings no longer create value. Instead, they destroy shareholder value. It can also become extractive with the company’s management, who keep raising money via ATM offerings, reaping more benefits than the shareholders.
Sigel offers solutions he believes could help
Sigel has advised companies pursuing a Bitcoin treasury strategy to adopt safeguards now, while premiums still exist.
He suggested announcing a pause to ATM issuance if the stock trades below 0.95 times NAV for 10 or more trading days and prioritizing buybacks when BTC appreciates, but the equity fails to reflect that value.
He also mentioned launching a strategic review if NAV discount persists which might include a merger, spinoff, or sunset of the BTC strategy.
As far as Sigel is concerned, “executive compensation should be aligned with NAV per share growth, not with the size of the Bitcoin position or total share count.”
He highlighted how it has happened before with the BTC miners, pointing out that there was persistent issuance and outsized executive pay, things the industry could do without this time.
“Once you are trading at NAV, shareholder dilution is no longer strategic. It is extractive,” Sigel wrote. “Boards and shareholders should act with discipline now, while they still have the benefit of optionality.”
The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.
