Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim wants Bitcoin on the table as a serious contender in the city’s financial strategy. He proposed Vancouver explore Bitcoin as a reserve asset to diversify its financial reserves and protect the city’s purchasing power.
His proposal will be reviewed by the Vancouver City Council on December 11. Sim’s motion, “Preserving the City’s Purchasing Power Through Diversification of Financial Reserves – Becoming a Bitcoin Friendly City,” is being pitched as a forward-thinking move in an economy he says is riddled with uncertainty.
During a council meeting, Sim made his case loud and clear. He told council members that Bitcoin’s performance over the past 16 years can’t be ignored. “It would be irresponsible for the City of Vancouver to not look at the merits of adding Bitcoin to the City’s strategic assets,” Sim said.
The mayor has called Bitcoin “the greatest invention in human history” and suggested that other cities should be paying attention to what Vancouver is trying to do.
Bitcoin’s place in Vancouver’s future
The proposal focuses on hedging against inflation and ensuring financial resilience. Bitcoin’s limited supply, capped at 21 million coins, gives it an edge over traditional currencies, which can be printed endlessly.
Sim argued that Bitcoin offers a unique shield against the erosion of purchasing power in an economy where inflation is a constant threat.
The motion is about more than just inflation, though. Diversification is a key element of Sim’s strategy. The mayor wants to reduce Vancouver’s reliance on traditional financial assets, which he says are vulnerable to economic shocks.
Not everyone shares Sim’s optimism. The idea of using Bitcoin as a municipal reserve asset has raised eyebrows. Bitcoin’s volatility is one of the most obvious concerns. Its price has seen dramatic swings, including an 80% drop between November 2021 and November 2022.
Critics argue that this unpredictability makes it a risky choice for a city’s financial foundation. Another sticking point is Bitcoin’s lack of intrinsic value. Unlike gold, which has been a reliable store of value for centuries, Bitcoin is entirely digital and has no physical backing.
Economists have questioned whether Bitcoin can truly be a stable asset in the long term, pointing out that its value is largely speculative and doesn’t have the same industrial or historical backing as gold.
Liquidity is another concern. Reserve assets are supposed to be liquid and accessible during emergencies. Bitcoin’s design doesn’t align with this purpose. Its value often depends on long-term holding rather than short-term liquidity. Critics argue that this makes it unsuitable as a financial safety net for municipalities.
Land a High-Paying Web3 Job in 90 Days: The Ultimate Roadmap
