NEW: FREE Web3 Resume Cheat Sheet DOWNLOAD NOW

SEC ordered to explain itself over blocking Coinbase’s call for crypto rules

In this post:

  • A U.S. court told the SEC to explain why it blocked Coinbase’s request for crypto rules.
  • The SEC’s decision was called “arbitrary and capricious” by the court.
  • Coinbase is fighting another SEC case over whether tokens like Solana are securities.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been put on blast by a federal appeals court, which has demanded the agency justify its decision to block Coinbase’s 2022 petition for clear crypto regulations.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit called the SEC’s move “arbitrary and capricious,” signaling that the regulator might have bitten off more than it can chew with its aggressive stance against the crypto industry.

Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, shared the news, saying, “We just won our petition for a writ of mandamus at the Third Circuit.”

He highlighted the court’s rebuke of the SEC’s “insufficiently reasoned” denial of Coinbase’s petition, adding that Judge Stephanos Bibas had flagged looming constitutional concerns over the SEC’s enforcement tactics.

According to Paul, the decision sends a strong message: regulators can’t simply enforce laws without providing clear rules upfront.

Judges call out the SEC

The court’s ruling stopped short of forcing the SEC to draft specific rules for cryptocurrency but made it clear that the agency owes an explanation. Coinbase’s original petition sought clarity on a crucial question: when do digital assets qualify as securities?

See also  CFTC sets out to finally end crypto regulation by enforcement

Without clear guidance, crypto companies have been left in a legal gray zone, navigating unpredictable enforcement actions rather than established rules.

Judge Bibas, known for his blunt rulings, criticized the agency’s reliance on enforcement without prior guidance, pointing out that new technologies like crypto come with unique risks that require proactive regulation—not just retroactive penalties.

This isn’t the first time the SEC has been called out for its handling of the crypto industry, but the Coinbase case could mark a turning point.

By forcing the SEC to explain its reasoning, the court has essentially demanded more transparency from the agency, which has long maintained that most cryptocurrencies, apart from Bitcoin, are securities and therefore fall under its jurisdiction.

Coinbase fights on multiple fronts

While Coinbase celebrates this partial victory, the company is still deep in the trenches of another legal battle with the SEC. Last year, Judge Katherine Failla denied Coinbase’s motion to dismiss the SEC’s lawsuit against it, setting the stage for a high-stakes court fight over whether crypto tokens listed on Coinbase’s platform qualify as securities.

Failla’s ruling leaned heavily on the Howey Test, a decades-old legal standard used to determine whether an asset is a security. She rejected Coinbase’s argument that crypto should be considered a “major question” of economic significance, which would limit the SEC’s authority.

See also  US SEC launches a 'crypto task force' website

Instead, she sided with the agency’s claim that many of the cryptocurrencies offered on Coinbase’s platform, such as Solana, are investment contracts.

However, Failla’s ruling wasn’t the end of the road. She granted Coinbase permission to file an interlocutory appeal, allowing the company to challenge her decision before a final verdict.

This appeal is important because it could fast-track a definitive ruling on whether crypto tokens are securities, potentially reshaping how the entire industry operates.

“We appreciate the Court’s careful consideration,” Paul said after the decision. “On to the Second Circuit we go.”

The appeal could add to the complexity. While some judges, like Failla, appear to back the SEC’s arguments, others have pushed back. For instance, the judge overseeing the Ripple case ruled that not all transactions involving XRP qualify as securities.

The SEC’s enforcement-first strategy has been a source of frustration for the crypto industry, which has repeatedly called for clear guidelines. Under Chair Gary Gensler, the agency has ramped up its crackdown on crypto companies, bringing high-profile lawsuits against Ripple, Coinbase, and other major players.

Gensler has argued that most crypto tokens are securities and that companies are violating the law by failing to register them with the SEC.

Cryptopolitan Academy: How to Write a Web3 Resume That Lands Interviews - FREE Cheat Sheet

Share link:

Disclaimer. The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

Most read

Loading Most Read articles...

Stay on top of crypto news, get daily updates in your inbox

Editor's choice

Loading Editor's Choice articles...
Subscribe to CryptoPolitan