COMING SOON: A New Way to Earn Passive Income with DeFi in 2025 LEARN MORE

Vitalik says rollups may lose billions if security isn’t proven before decentralizing

In this post:

  • Ethereum’s Vitalik Buterin believes L2 rollup systems should only advance to stage 2 if the proof system is highly reliable; otherwise, they’ll risk losing millions of dollars.
  • Daniel Wanag proposed having a BattleTested label for roll-up systems to ensure security.
  • Buterin believes as proof system quality rises, the optimal stage moves from stage 0 to stage 1 then stage 2.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has issued a stark warning to developers of rollup-based L2 systems solutions, emphasizing that the rush to decentralize without robust security measures could result in catastrophic financial losses

In an X post, the Ethereum co-founder pointed out that achieving stage 2 in an L2 network is critical for security; however, he claimed that it’s just as vital to strengthen the underlying proof system. He added that rushing to stage 2 without significantly improving proof reliability could actually increase the chances of failure.

One of Buterin’s points of concern is that many rollups still rely on centralized control mechanisms, “training wheels,” as he described. While useful to help get the ball rolling, they can also become single points of failure that hinder progress unless replaced with robust, decentralized alternatives.

He stressed that rollups are vulnerable to attacks and operational failures without proper security measures such as fraud or validity proofs, threatening user trust and damaging the wider Ethereum ecosystem.

Daniel Wang suggests adding a “BattleTested” label to Layer 2 roll-ups

Buterin’s post came in response to Loopring founder and CEO Daniel Wang’s suggestion to have a separate label for Stage 2- BattleTested- for improved security. 

The Loopring CEO asserted that a roll-up could be classified as BattleTested if its code has been on Ethereum’s mainnet for more than six months and maintained a TVL of $100 million, including at least $50 million in Ethereum and a major stablecoin.

See also  Crypto industry takes Dubai for TOKEN2049 as Trump hype starts to cool off back home

He also proposed that the BattleTested status should not be permanent— any changes made to the rollup should require it to go through the qualification process all over again to earn back the label.

Then again, it would not matter if a roll-up was in stage 2 or not; a roll-up could still qualify for the BattleTested label. 

Responding to Wang’s proposal, Buterin remarked: “A good reminder that stage 2 is not the only thing that matters for security: the quality of the underlying proof system matters too.” 

Dominick John, an analyst at Kronos Research, also argued that a system becomes truly decentralized when it can prove reliable under economic stress and not just through theoretical proof system designs. 

He added that before shifting from stage 1 to stage 2, rollup teams must also prepare for the risks they’ll face that threaten network security.

Buterin: Rollups should hit stage 2 only with strong proof systems

In another X post, Buterin elaborated on the best time to move to stage 2 in a mathematical model

In his model, he made the following assumptions: each security council member has a 10% failure rate, liveness failure and safety failure are equally probable, stage 0 security council is 4-of-7, and stage 1 is 6-of-8. 

Considering these assumptions, he argued that as the proof system quality rises, the optimal stage shifts from Stage 0 to Stage 1 and eventually to Stage 2. That means stages 0 or 1 are more reliable when failure probabilities increase than stage 2. Therefore, advancing to stage 2 is only appropriate when your proof system is dependable.

See also  Ethereum sees 62% surge in active addresses as devs launch token-free R1 layer-2

With these hypotheses, he claimed that as the proof system strengthens, the peak level will move from Stage 0 to Stage 1 and then Stage 2. Therefore, stages 0 or 1 are more reliable as the probability of failure increases compared to stage 2. So, you should only move on to phase 2 if you have a reliable system of proofs.

He further suggested that using multi-sig-proof systems would lower the likelihood of system breakdown.

In addition, Mike Tiutin, chief technology officer of decentralized compliance protocol PureFi, offered his perspective on the topic, with the belief that you could be compromising your system security by decentralizing prematurely.

In the same vein, Kronos analyst John contended that decentralization should not be considered a race but a shared responsibility of the crypto ecosystem. In stage 1, councils can step in to assist if the system breaks, but in stage 2, a stepback would involve millions of dollars, he said.

Cryptopolitan Academy: Tired of market swings? Learn how DeFi can help you build steady passive income. Register Now

Share link:

Disclaimer. The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

Most read

Loading Most Read articles...

Stay on top of crypto news, get daily updates in your inbox

Editor's choice

Loading Editor's Choice articles...

- The Crypto newsletter that keeps you ahead -

Markets move fast.

We move faster.

Subscribe to Cryptopolitan Daily and get timely, sharp, and relevant crypto insights straight to your inbox.

Join now and
never miss a move.

Get in. Get the facts.
Get ahead.

Subscribe to CryptoPolitan