- Grayscale research head Zach Pandl framed Ethereum as a minimal nation state that runs by printing ETH rather than taxing.
- Stakers are paid in freshly minted ETH for providing security, collapsing fiscal and monetary policy into a single loop.
- The comparison lands amid a contested funding debate, with client teams costing around $30 million a year.
Grayscale’s head of research, Zach Pandl, has shared a thought experiment on X that recasts Ethereum as a tiny country running its books through money printing rather than taxes.
Pandl tagged his post as a “Quasi brainstorm on $ETH issuance.” He then went into the details, where he stated that Ethereum “is akin to a minimal nation-state” that has one job, which is to guard property rights and the exchange of value.
He also discussed how Ethereum will be funding its spending, having written that “Ethereum does not raise taxes to fund government services.”
Pandl said that the network funds itself through money printing; in this case, that will be ETH. This revenue source is called seigniorage by economists, and it is the profit a currency issuer earns simply by creating money.
Who will be protecting Ethereum’s property rights in Pandl’s setup?
Stakers are the group that will be providing the service of protecting Ethereum. The stakers are then compensated for their services with newly printed ETH, according to Pandl.
The setup brings fiscal and monetary policy into one loop, something that most economies tend to separate.
This is happening in Pandl’s quasi-brainstorm as the act of securing the network is also the act of expanding the money supply.
It also highlights a difference between Bitcoin and Ether. BTC’s supply is capped at a fixed number. However, ETH issuance floats instead, rising and falling with how busy the network is and how much of the token is staked. This makes scarcity harder to pin down for anyone who sees ETH as a store of value.
Why is the ETH issuance math currently contested right now?
Ethereum validators collectively earn around 700,000 ETH a year in staking rewards, but currently, the ecosystem is reportedly short on cash to pay its core developers.
In June, former Ethereum Foundation coordinator Trent Van Epps pointed out that keeping the network’s client teams running costs about $30 million a year. He highlighted the dangers of not having a clear source of funding lined up as the Foundation cuts spending.
There have been various inputs on what the foundation can do to fill that gap. One camp believes that the gap can be filled by taking out from the rewards that go to validators.
However, critics of that move say that there is no point in doing that if validators are willing to part with some yield. Their main argument is that there is no need to build a new distribution layer; instead, the network could simply issue less ETH.
While Pandl’s nation-state sketch is not a solution to the funding gap, it highlights that issuance is the treasury, and every argument about funding is an argument about how large that treasury should be.
If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.
FAQs
Who is Zach Pandl and what did he say about Ethereum?
Zach Pandl is Grayscale's head of research. On August 15 he posted on X that Ethereum "is akin to a minimal nation state," with one government service, protecting property rights and value exchange, funded by issuing new ETH rather than by taxes.
How does Ethereum's issuance model differ from Bitcoin's?
Bitcoin has a fixed supply, while ETH issuance is dynamic and shifts with network activity and staking participation. That flexibility lets Ethereum adjust to conditions but makes its scarcity harder to assess.
Why is Ethereum's issuance a live debate?
The Ethereum Foundation is cutting spending, and Trent Van Epps has said core development costs about $30 million a year with funding uncertain. Some propose redirecting validator rewards, which total roughly 700,000 ETH annually, while critics argue the network could simply reduce issuance instead.
Disclaimer. The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.
Hannah Collymore
Hannah is a writer and editor with nearly a decade of blog writing and event reporting experience in the crypto space. At Cryptopolitan, Hannah contributes to the news page, reporting and analyzing the latest developments in DeFi, RWA, crypto regulation, AI and frontier tech industries. She graduated from Arcadia university with a degree in Business Administration.
