Your bank is using your money. You’re getting the scraps.WATCH FREE

DOJ blames court error after Trump-linked crypto scam is briefly sealed

In this post:

  • DOJ blames court clerical error for sealing entire docket in a crypto scam case linked to Trump and MoonPay executives.
  • Interim US Attorney Jeanine Pirro says the complaint was amended to protect victim identities, not to seal the case.
  • Critics allege favoritism as DOJ seeks to recover funds for Trump-connected victims while broader crypto enforcement wanes.

 

After the US Department of Justice sealed a court case docket involving crypto fraud tied to executives at MoonPay, US Attorney Jeanine Pinto now says it was a “clerical error,” claiming the District of Columbia court did not request full closure of the case from public view.

The case accused a Nigerian scammer of impersonating Trump associate Steve Witkoff to defraud two individuals of $250,000 in Ethereum, and reportedly involved the CEO and CFO of MoonPay.

Clerical error sealed docket, DOJ claims

Pirro, a former Fox News personality and Trump ally currently awaiting Senate confirmation to the permanent US attorney role, told NOTUS the entire docket was sealed due to a court clerk’s mistake. 

According to her, the DOJ had only requested that an amended version of the complaint be made public after removing a company’s name to protect the victims’ identities.

The court made a ministerial, clerical error that, as soon as we realized it, within hours, the whole docket was unsealed,” Pirro said. “They admitted we never asked for the docket to be sealed.”

Prosecutors filed the amended complaint and a separate sealed motion last week. By Monday, however, the entire court file was inaccessible to the public. The matter was discovered after investigative outlet NOTUS linked the redacted second names of “Ivan” and “Mouna” in the complaint to MoonPay’s leadership.

See also  Sentinel Global founder warns stablecoins mirror CBDC risks

DOJ redacted the names of the victims

The original and amended complaints referenced two victims only by their first names, while their full identities were not disclosed in the public version. The names and linked wallet address match those of MoonPay’s CEO Ivan Soto-Wright and US CFO Mouna Ammari Siala. 

The wallet address allegedly used to send the funds to the scammer had previously been tied to Soto-Wright in a separate 2023 court filing.

Federal prosecutors had attempted to redact the original document to protect the names of victims. However, both versions of the complaint reportedly included an unredacted link to a blockchain transaction that allowed the public to trace the wallet address, revealing a connection to Soto-Wright.

This is the type of case where victims, including individuals, employees of a company, as well as a victim company, have a right not to have their names included in a complaint,” Pirro told NOTUS in defense of the redactions.

According to the complaint, the alleged Nigerian scammer impersonated real estate developer Steve Witkoff, the co-chair of Trump’s 2017 inaugural committee. The fraudster used a typographical trick, replacing the lowercase “L” in “inaugural” with an uppercase “I” in the fake email address, steve_witkoff@t47lnaugural.

MoonPay execs favoured over other victims in funds recovery

MoonPay has had previous business dealings involving Trump-related cryptos. The company had been an exclusive partner in trading $TRUMP, a memecoin tied to the Trump family. Executives reportedly boasted about the profits made from the token’s success.

Naysayers argue the DOJ was only trying to recover funds for MoonPay’s executives due to their relationship with President Trump, and enforcement actions against other crypto companies have waned.

“If you’re friendly with Trump and you’re a Trump crypto bro, you get the DOJ proactively trying to recover your assets,” Mark Hays, a crypto policy advocate with Americans for Financial Reform, told NOTUS. 

See also  Litecoin price analysis 20 June 2019; is Litecoin hype finished? Or is it just beginning?

One former prosecutor who recently left the DC Attorney’s Office, speaking anonymously, said that while it’s common to file specific documents under seal like medical records or national security materials, it is rare for the entire docket to be closed without a specific motion.

Still letting the bank keep the best part? Watch our free video on being your own bank.

Share link:

Disclaimer. The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

Most read

Loading Most Read articles...

Stay on top of crypto news, get daily updates in your inbox

Editor's choice

Loading Editor's Choice articles...

- The Crypto newsletter that keeps you ahead -

Markets move fast.

We move faster.

Subscribe to Cryptopolitan Daily and get timely, sharp, and relevant crypto insights straight to your inbox.

Join now and
never miss a move.

Get in. Get the facts.
Get ahead.

Subscribe to CryptoPolitan