Why AI Writing Detectors Find the US Constitution Written by An AI Tool

ai writing detector

Most read

Loading Most Ready posts..


  • AI writing detectors often give false positives, flagging human-written text as AI-generated due to similarities with training data.
  • Properties like perplexity and burstiness are used to evaluate text, but they have limitations in accurately detecting AI-generated content.
  • Flawed AI writing detectors can lead to false accusations, causing severe consequences for students and undermining the reliability of these tools.

AI writing detectors have raised eyebrows by mistakenly identifying human-authored text, including the US Constitution, as being generated by AI models. This phenomenon has prompted an examination of why these detectors produce false positives. Experts and the creator of the AI writing detector GPTZero were consulted to shed light on this issue.

Understanding AI detection methods

AI writing detectors employ various methods, but their premise remains the same. They use AI models trained on extensive text data, including human-written and AI-generated examples, to determine the likelihood of text being human or AI-generated. Properties like perplexity and burstiness are used to evaluate the text and make classifications.

Perplexity measures how closely a piece of text aligns with the training data of an AI model. AI models, like ChatGPT, tend to generate text that resembles their training data, resulting in low perplexity ratings. However, human writers can also produce text with low perplexity, especially when imitating formal styles or using common phrases. This undermines the reliability of AI writing detectors in distinguishing AI-generated text from human-written text.

Burstiness evaluation

Burstiness examines the variability in sentence length and structure within a text. Human writers often exhibit dynamic writing styles with diverse sentence lengths and structures, while AI-generated text tends to be more consistent and uniform. However, exceptions exist, as human writers can adopt consistent styles, and AI models can be trained to simulate human-like variability. As AI language models improve, their writing becomes more similar to human writing, challenging the effectiveness of burstiness as a metric for AI detection.

AI writing detectors, such as GPTZero, mistakenly identify sections of the US Constitution as AI-generated due to its extensive language presence in training data. The repeated exposure of the Constitution’s text in training large language models generates similar language, resulting in false positives. However, human writers can also create content with low perplexity and consistent styles, further undermining the reliability of AI writing detectors.

Limitations of AI writing detectors

Practical studies have shown that AI-generated text detectors are unreliable and perform only slightly better than random classifiers. These detectors can be easily defeated by paraphrasing attacks that modify the output of language models while retaining the intended meaning. Additionally, AI writing detection exhibits bias against non-native English speakers, potentially penalizing them unfairly.

Using flawed AI writing detectors has severe consequences, particularly for students. False accusations based on these tools can lead to failing grades, academic probation, suspension, or expulsion. Students have experienced immense stress and anxiety when defending themselves against accusations despite no evidence of cheating. The personal cost of these false accusations can be damaging and reminiscent of a modern-day academic witch hunt.

The future of AI writing detection

Recognizing the limitations of AI writing detectors, experts advocate for the responsible use of AI language models in education. While AI assistance can accelerate writing tasks, ensuring that the writing reflects the writer’s intentions and knowledge is crucial. Teachers can assess students’ understanding of their work and verify the accuracy of facts. Relying on AI writing detectors with high false positive rates is not recommended.

AI writing detectors face challenges in accurately identifying AI-generated text. The false identification of the US Constitution as AI-generated exemplifies the limitations of these tools. Responsible use of AI language models, human oversight, and contextual understanding is crucial. The future lies in striking a balance between human creativity and the efficiency provided by AI, ensuring that AI language models are used appropriately. AI assistance is here to stay, and if utilized wisely, it can speed up composition ethically. However, relying solely on AI writing detectors is not a reliable solution.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decision.

Share link:

John Palmer

John Palmer is an enthusiastic crypto writer with an interest in Bitcoin, Blockchain, and technical analysis. With a focus on daily market analysis, his research helps traders and investors alike. His particular interest in digital wallets and blockchain aids his audience.

Stay on top of crypto news, get daily updates in your inbox

Related News

Subscribe to CryptoPolitan